Tuesday, April 24, 2012

Understanding What’s in your ECA 2012 Annual Meeting Package


Elizabeth Condominium Association members should now have the Annual Meeting correspondence that includes:
--The cover letter of explanation from the ECA Board of Directors,
--Agenda for the May 2 meeting,
--A Proxy/Ballot,
--The proposed Amendments to the Bylaws. 

If you do not have this package, contact our management office and Jim Santos immediately.

This is a critically important meeting. Why?

#1 We are electing five (5) board members (normally this year we would elect 4).

#2 We will be voting on two bylaw amendments which will put us into conformance with recommendations consistent with Maryland Condominium law and which will potentially help us manage our resources better if these two amendments are approved by ECA Association members.

There has been some concern among a number of Association members that the amendment pertaining to lowering the percent of membership voting power (this is based on square footage of ownership) required to change other bylaws in the future from the current 75% to 66 2/3% is flawed because it substituted the original word ‘value’ with a the new word ‘votes.’ Therefore, our condominium lawyer Jason Fisher has issued the following clarification in which he concludes that there is no significant difference in meaning between ‘value’ and ‘votes.’

Clarification of Language in Proposed Bylaw Amendment #2
(from Association Counsel)


The modification of the language is made to have the amendment language consistent with the Maryland Condominium Act as well as the defined provisions of the documents. Specifically, Section 11-104(e)(2) of the Condominium Act provides:
(e) Amendments. --
   (2) (i) Except as provided in subparagraph (ii) of this paragraph, unless a higher percentage is required in the bylaws, the bylaws may be amended by the affirmative vote of unit owners having at least 66 2/3 percent of the votes in the council of unit owners.

The effect of the proposed amendment is to lower the percentage required to amend the bylaws from 75% to 66 2/3%, which is consistent with the Act as well as a most condominiums.  The vote required is still 66 2/3 of all owners of the Condominium (not just 66 2/3% of those present at a meeting). 

With respect to the use of the word “value” in the later sentence, it could also be changed to “vote” but in essence has no different meaning in this context.  The word “value” was used in the original version because it is referring to a petition of the owners, and the minimum number of owners who must sign the petition to initiate the action to call for an amendment.  In a petition, the owners signing are really not “voting” per se at that point, but are merely requesting a meeting be called to vote on a specific issue. As such, the signing of the petition in itself is not a “vote” but the percentage of 20% referenced merely refers to the percentage of owners required to sign the petition who represent 20% of the total owners of the association. The 20% is calculated based upon the equivalent voting interest of those who sign it.

It may be a bit confusing to some and really only a semantic difference, but the language has no significant difference in meaning.


Also, in case you are wondering, Jeremy M. Tucker, the attorney of record on our amendment changes, is a colleague of Jason Fisher, our lead attorney. They are both in the same legal firm, a firm that specializes in Maryland condominium law. Mr. Tucker has worked on other legal matters for The Elizabeth with Mr. Fisher. These are the most qualified attorneys that The Elizabeth has ever retained because they specialize in condominium law and are active with the association that supports condo laws.

Approving these new amendments is vitally important to the future health, safety, and quality of life at The Elizabeth. We need 75% of the Association votes (again, this means the votes are based on square footage of ownership value) in order to pass these bylaw changes. 

Be a good citizen by attending the annual meeting and voting then or by turning in your completed proxy to our management office. Also please encourage your neighbors to do the same. Every year those of us who attend the annual meeting are subject to the possibility that because not enough of the membership (what is required is 51%) will have filed their proxies or shown up at the annual meeting that we will not be able to conduct the annual meeting as scheduled. This year we need  75% of the membership to participate. 

If you have questions, I will do my best to help answer them. 

Tuesday, April 17, 2012

Successful 2012 Meet the Candidates Night


Based on a well-run and highly professional exchange between candidates and attending audience at the 2012 Meet the Candidates night, the Elizabeth Condominium Association is now positioned to elect the most qualified candidates to handle our investment in many years. We personally endorse:

Ted Ariev
John McNerney
David Robinson
Herman Stekler

Each of these candidates has the leadership experience and expertise to help us through the complex problems we are now facing. While they are open to getting training as needed to run our Association business, we believe these candidates know how to work strategically and tactically with our daunting projects as well as work successfully with all sorts of people and communities. It appears from their presentations and resumes, they also know how to put personalities aside and get the job done. In the recent past, we have had good-hearted people working for us but approaching our problems on a tactical level, detail by detail. We need directors who have the big picture in mind, the savvy, and the competencies to take us to the next level in restoring our building and our community.


We suggest each voting member of the Association take a careful look at all the candidates qualifications and talk to them one on one if possible.

There are five candidates that will be elected. We have given careful consideration to whom our fifth choice will be and we hope each Association member will do the same. Meanwhile, we are excited that with this election there is a solid opportunity to elect a board that will bring a new level of professionalism and expertise to us at a critical time in the management of our investment in the Elizabeth.

About 80 people attended the program. Jim Santos deserves credit for establishing the rules up front and keeping the program moving along.

Karren Alenier & Jim Rich

Sunday, April 15, 2012

Typical Questions to Ask Candidates Running for the ECA Board of Directors

2012 Roster of Candidates Running for ECA Board of Directors

Ted Ariev
Molly Frantz
John McNerney
Al Muller
David Robinson
Steven Schattman
Herman Stekler

At the Annual Meeting May 2nd, you will vote for five (5) of these candidates. Sitting candidates not up for election are Charles Bresler and Ilo-Mai Harding.


Monday April 16 you can meet these candidates and ask questions.

What should you ask?
[PRINT THIS OUT AND TAKE IT TO THE MEETING.]

All candidates should be asked:

Do you have your personal finances in order? – Have you always paid your condominium fees on time? Have you ever suffered bankruptcy? Have you ever failed to settle your financial debts?

Why are you running and what three things do you hope to accomplish?

What is your availability for ECA board meetings? Do you plan to attend 100 percent?, 80 percent? 50 percent?

How do you rate yourself in your ability to handle financial matters for the Association? Average, Above average, Outstanding? If you rate yourself above average or outstanding, what experience supports this rating?

What is your experience in working as a board member?
Are you willing to:

  • ·    —Compromise?
  • ·      --Research & seek more information, particularly from other Association members?
  • ·      --Hire expects when necessary?
  • ·      --Get advice from our Legum & Norman managers?

What is the likelihood that you will quit if elected?

What is your position on allowing board member to hold proxies for non-attending Association members? Should board members ethically be allowed to hold proxies and influence the outcome of the election or major issue?

It costs the Association significant money to get a board member up to speed. Are you willing to go through professional training to become a better performing board member?

If elected, would you be willing to serve as president of the ECA Board and what would you do to ensure efficiently run meetings? 

Are you familiar with Robert’s Rules of Order and if not, are you willing to be trained on these rules?

Summary of ECA Board Meeting March 26 2012


Present: Directors: Seth Levine, Charles Bressler, Judi Barth, Ilo-Mai Harding, Alexandra Kielty, Alfred Muller, David Robinson, ECA General Manager Jim Santos, ECA Assistant Manager Wanda Powell, Legum & Norman Community Manager Greg Roby, recording secretary

Party Room Rental: Treasurer Al Muller wants to do away with the rental fee. The Board decided to get input from Association. Issues include abuse of the furniture and physical aspects of the room, bookings that are not kept that keep others from using the room.

Finance Committee Appointments: Al Muller organized this committee that includes Mary Catherine Curran, Sally Hart, Steven Schattman, and Herman Stekler. What is unclear is what the responsibilities of this committee are and whether this committee should be an oversight entity and independent of Board interaction.

Minutes: passed with one change related to correction about unqualified audit.

Improvement Projects Report by Ted Ariev: Mechanical inspection almost done. Fan coil units issue: will prepare implications of this. Issues about panels & switchboard. Fire alarm system out of date. Structural work restrained by weather. Roof inspection: report coming on moisture penetration. Separation of window & sliding door replacement. Canopies can be repaired. No need to replace. Start work June or July. Replacement of sliding glass door also involves balcony repair & it requires no scaffolding. Fire alarm system 37 yrs old--code problems, parts no longer available. Can system be done in phases? Will look at moisture issues in pool area. From the floor, Pam Dillon said the fire system was upgraded.

Board action on adding new hairdresser shop to commercial outdoor sign.
Allowed but at the expense of the commercial side.

Website not approved yet. Contractual issue.

Refurbishment Survey: over choice between green and brown carpet, people preferred the green option. Preferred bench option. 124 responses.