Tuesday, April 28, 2009

Summary of Meet the Candidates Program

I had to miss the Meet the Candidates program held April 23 but I'm posting the summary that Patti Absher wrote with input from Peg Downey. Patti invites other attendees to add to this summary. 

Three major issues confront our condo association:

1)    Improving our current management by making changes in the existing management or replacing it with a professional management company.

2)    How to refurbish the building’s public areas.

3)    When to replace windows and doors for all units.

 

Karren Alenier

Professional Management: supports

Refurbishment: supports

Window/Door Replacement: supports

 Ms. Alenier, who has a background of management within the federal government, said a condo board needs to be working at a supervisory and planning level, rather than performing management work the staff if staff have not. She therefore supports contracting with a professional management company where greater resources and group discounts can be realized. She believes a good professional management company and replacement of leaky windows and doors will help the Elizabeth achieve cost savings. Ms. Alenier supports communication within the Elizabeth, and is the creator of this blog.

Sharon Bobb

Professional Management: supports

Refurbishment: supports

Window/Door Replacement: supports

Ms. Bobb has made replacement of windows/doors a visible issue at monthly board meetings and has done extensive research that she supplied to the current board. As a retired human resources executive manager, she wrote job descriptions for all the current staff, hoping to help solve some of the existing management issues. She supports effective management and a board that communicates well with each other and the residents. She sees the refurbishment as a way to enhance our property values but also as an opportunity to improve the quality of life at the Elizabeth.

Charles Bressler 

Professional Management: does not support

Refurbishment: supports

Window/Door Replacement: supports

Mr. Bressler, a former Board president, believes that the current in house manager should be replaced and recently asked her to consider resigning so that her predecessor could be brought back.  He also believes that the Board can and should continue to manage an in-house staff. In the interest of preserving property values, he, as a real estate agent, supports the refurbishment and the replacement of doors/windows. He did caution that he believes the refurbishment project will go over budget as it did when he was involved with building refurbishment 20 years ago.

Monique Fridell

Professional Management: does not support

Refurbishment: supports

Window/Door Replacement: does not support windows in the near future 

Ms. Friedell, an incumbent board member serving as treasurer, makes conserving money her primary concern.  Ms. Fridell believes that in-house management needs additional time and direction by the Board in order for staff to do their jobs effectively. However, she also said our manager has too many responsibilities and serves in the dual role of in-house and community manager. On the issue of window replacement, her goal for the Elizabeth is that it become a “green” building, but currently supports the information in the Reserve Study which recommended replacement of windows/doors in 2021. 

Judy Gann 

Professional Management: supports 

Refurbishment: supports

Window/Door Replacement: unclear. She said she has storm windows in her apartment and that they make a very big difference.

As incumbent board member and Board Secretary, Ms. Gann led the search for a contractor to provide needed improvements in the interior design of lobbies, halls, and other shared spaces in the Elizabeth and wishes to continue that work. She also chaired the Landscaping Committee.

Alexandra Kielty

Professional Management: her position was unclear but leaned toward in-house management 

Refurbishment: supports

Window/Door Replacement: unclear 

Ms. Kielty, an incumbent board member, supports refurbishment of the building, particularly as it pertains to the exercise room.  She is concerned about rising condo fees but also sees the need to spend money to preserve the value of homes in the Elizabeth.

 

Saturday, April 25, 2009

New Condo Loan Rules

On the front page of today’s (April 25, 2009) Washington Post appears an article on the new scrutiny by lenders placed on a condominium owner’s neighbors when he or she attempts to refinance his or her property. The article makes the point that everyone shares in the financial burden of a condo.

I experienced this earlier this month when I started the process to refinance my apartment in order to get a lower interest rate on my mortgage as well as see about taking equity for improvements. Lenders are now carefully examining how many owners are delinquent in paying their condominium fees in your building, what the ratio of resident owners are to renters, and how much your condo fee is relative to your property size and services rendered. I was asked about all of these points and so far was able to jump through these hurdles.

Protecting your property value is now an increasing item of concern given that foreclosures are high in the condo real estate sector. Please read the news article carefully in regard to what the future may hold for your property value here at the Elizabeth.

Friday, April 24, 2009

Support our Village Council Members May 11

May 11 from 7 AM to 8 PM, the polls will be open to vote for the people who represent us on the Friendship Heights Village Center Council. Do your civic duty and vote.

Chip Mudd and Maurice Trebach are the Elizabethans who sit on that Council currently and are up for re-election. They provide us with invaluable information about what is happening in our community. For example, Maurice explained to us one night at our monthly board meeting about the crosswalk project going on in the streets here before it started and has kept us posted on its progress.

If you cannot vote in person, you can request a ballot from the League of Women Voters. (Get the application from FHV website at http://www.friendshipheightsmd.gov/PDFs/AbsBallot_Applic-2-23-09.pdf.)

ABSENTEE BALLOTS WILL ONLY BE ISSUED ON WRITTEN
APPLICATION. TO ALLOW FOR MAILING TIME, THIS COMPLETED
APPLICATION MUST BE RECEIVED BY FRIDAY, MAY 1, 2009* AT THE
FOLLOWING ADDRESS:

The League of Women Voters of Montgomery County
12216 Parklawn Drive, Suite 100, Rockville, Maryland 20852

(*If unable to meet this deadline, leave a message at 301 984-9585, or e-mail
lwvmc@erols.com)

Wednesday, April 22, 2009

Summary of April 2009 Elizabeth Condo Board Meeting

The April meeting of Elizabeth Condo Board focused on such items as the contract for professional management with Legum & Norman, a startling heads up from Legum & Norman that for years we have been paying thousands of dollars for utility taxes that we should NOT have been paying, the initiation of our refurbishment project with Phyllis Hartman of the Hartman Design Group, garage repairs, purchase and installation of an emergency generator, and window replacement. Here is a thumbnail list of what took place.

Professional Management
• Update presented on the professional management contract by ECA president Woody Cunningham. Not yet final and signed, but close. There have been lengthy negotiations. Will have a public meeting to provide info as soon as contract is signed.
• Jim Lawson submitted a request for a public meeting so the owners could discuss whether there should be professional management. This was discussed with our attorney, Jason Fisher, and the answer is that there will be no such meeting. Lawson asked that the issue be voted on at the annual meeting, and Cunningham said that this would not happen. Charles Bressler later challenged the Board about why no blank ballot had been inserted in the annual meeting package sent out to all residents and said by-laws would permit a call to vote on professional management.
• During contract negotiations with Legum & Norman, they advised that we are not required to pay sales tax on utility bills, something we have done for "quite some time" (Cunningham said, upon questioning, at least three years and possibly much longer). Cunningham said that we pay "several thousand dollars" per month in sales tax (an amount he estimated to be $4000 on average). A request has gone to the utility companies to rescind this requirement, and we will ask for the return of monies paid. The amount we could save in the future could easily amount to $48,000 per year or more. If monies are returned for just the previous three years that would amount to approximately $150,000 and recouped monies could easily exceed that amount if we paid in for many more years. Note: While some worry about the cost of professional management, this windfall could easily offset any additional cost—should there be any—and prove that professional management will save us money—not cost us more! The other point raised by this discovery is why didn't DeLeon & Stang, our accountants, point this out to us? This exemption is documented on the website of the state of Maryland.

Contracts & Repairs
• There is more work than originally anticipated to be done in the garage. It will be more costly and take longer to complete.
• They are beginning the second phase of the emergency generator purchase and installation. The generators will allow operation of one elevator at a time during an emergency power outage. A comment was made that an emergency plan needs to be written and activated.
• Emergency work began on the water penetration problem in apartment 06.
• Refurbishment contract was signed and the preliminary work started today. The designer, Phyllis Hartman, and her staff were in the building today taking measurements.

Energy
• Cunningham said he is pleased with the work done by the Energy Committee. Now, he will refocus the committee on specific areas. No specifics given.
• Maurice Trebach quoted the new Federal Energy Secretary who said that the most important thing we can do is make sure that our leaking windows and doors are fixed. Maurice said that he met with a representative from Titan Windows, the company that did the Highland House West, the Promenade, and Kenwood. Maurice gave him architectural drawings of the Elizabeth. During the week of May 11, the Titan rep will come back to us with specific information regarding cost to install anodized aluminum windows, double glass panels with air or gas in between the panels, and completely sealed.
• Maurice recommended that we do the windows in the near future rather than later on. He cited specifically that we can negotiate lower prices now and can borrow at a lower interest rate now. Putting off the work will cost us more.
• Al Muller pointed out that the Reserve Study reported that new windows would cost S5.6M, while the Energy Study would cost $2.4 M. Jeffrey Axelrad pointed out that the energy cost-savings in the Energy Study were estimated at only $34,000! [This is why we need to hire our own specialized engineer to give us a good number for the energy-cost savings.]
• At this point Sharon Bobb added that nobody has yet considered the cost offsets provided by Federal energy tax credits or the new 15 year low interest rate loans (up to $10,000 per household) and how these two possible offsets will apply to condominiums.

Exercise Room Equipment
• Alexandra Kielty asked for budget approval to begin replacing outdated equipment in the exercise rooms in 2010, a full year ahead of the budget plan set for 2011. The Board authorized an amount not to exceed $18,000, but the use of this money item by item would have to be approved by the Board. The treasurer raised objections because this was outside the five year plan.

March 2009 Minutes of ECA Board Meeting

MINUTES of a Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Elizabeth Condominium Association, Inc. (“Association”), held on March 17, 2009 in the Party Room of the Condominium pursuant to notice in accordance with the Bylaws. Present were: George “Woody” Cunningham, Jeffrey Axelrad, Judith Gann, Monique Fridell, Alexandra Kielty, Judith Barth and Alfred Muller.

The President called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m.

MINUTES:

A motion to accept the minutes of the Regular Meeting conducted on February 17, 2009 was made by Dr. Muller with a second by Ms. Kielty. The minutes were approved unanimously. Ms. Fridell asked whether the Manager had been given the opportunity to comment on the Minutes as recommended by the auditors, Deleon & Stang. Ms. Farrell had not seen the Minutes. The Board agreed that future draft Minutes will be sent to the Manager for comment prior to being voted upon.


PRESIDENT’S REPORT:

Mr. Cunningham reported that the Board had begun negotiations with Legum & Norman on a contract for outside management. It is anticipated that by April an informational meeting will be held for residents with Legum & Norman professionals present and available to answer questions.

The Board and Management are in the process of preparing a budget for 2009-2010 which should be finalized within the next two weeks.

The President has appointed a Nominating Committee comprised of Pat Peyser, Gerald Feldman and Peg Downey. April 23rd will be the “Meet the Candidates” night. Resumes of candidates for the Board are due to the committee by April 15th. Pursuant to the By Laws, the Annual Meeting and Election will take place on May 6th.

There are several contracts that will be voted on this evening.

TREASURER’S REPORT:

News
The FY 2008 audit was finalized last week. We apologize for the delay. As you may remember, we decided to await the final results of the Reserve Study to be able to include more solid numbers for the next five years in the Supplemental Information section of the audited statements. Tracy Geiger from Deleon & Stang will be attending this evening’s meeting and will be available to answer your questions. We will be presenting the final audit results to the Board this evening for approval. Residents have already received the financial reports in their mailboxes.

Pursuant to a recommendation of the auditors, a copy of the monthly cash management report will be available to residents prior to Board meetings and is attached as part of these minutes.

Reserve Advisors made a presentation to residents on 3/9/09 summarizing the analytical methodology and conclusions of the Reserve Study. The Board will be using the Reserve Study to make decisions in the coming weeks about the annual budget, capital expenditures and condo fee increases for FY 2010.

We have filed a lien against a delinquent owner; we expect to take this case to court in May 2009.

Asset Allocation
As of 2/28 we had almost $2.7 MM in cash and investments, 13 % higher YOY. We have slightly over $2 million in reserves, also 13% higher.

We have been investing at slightly longer maturities in an effort to earn an interest rate over 1% p.a.; however, we will start shortening tenors to ensure additional liquidity for major capital expenditures relating to the refurbishing project.

Monthly Performance
In February we had net income of $17K. We were in line with or under budget in all categories with the exception of Utilities and Cleaning & Trash Removal due to high usage of natural gas and electricity and a timing difference in Marble Maintenance. In February, we transferred almost $44K to reserves and spent almost $19K from reserves mostly on the emergency generator.

FY 2009 Year to Date (YTD) Results
For the eight months ending 2/28, we are running almost exactly at budget for the year in terms of total expenses, which are 4% higher than last year’s total expenses. Specific line items not meeting budget are:
• Interest income lower by 31% and 42%, respectively, for operating and Reserve investments, due to lower prevailing interest rate environment
• Printing 202% over budget due to printing of revised House Rules booklet, coupon books from previous years, and updated Resident Directories
• Accounting due to extra services incurred due to wait for Reserve Study
• Utilities as a category is 7% higher than last year, with electricity almost 14% higher due to higher usage, and to a lesser extent, increase per KwH price since December
• Office Equipment due to purchase of new phone system
• Other personnel due to replacement of time clock
• Sauna & Exercise Room due to purchase of new rower machine
• Other Amenities due to purchase of TV for West Lobby
• Elevator maintenance due to inspection and repair work on several elevators out/malfunctioning
• Inspections due to fire system/sprinkler inspections
• Association activities due to social activities Board has sponsored that were not in original budget

We have transferred $349K to reserves this year to date and spent $208K, or 62% less than last year, from reserves mostly on façade repairs, fire horn installation and correction of electrical system deficiencies.

MANAGEMENT REPORT:

A copy of the Management Report, dated March 17, 2009 is attached hereto. Ms. Farrell also noted that the Arcade owners would like changes to brighten up their area. They have suggested planters (there are two or more we own that are not currently being used) and benches. Ms. Farrell will discuss this matter with the landscaping company.

In addition, Ms. Farrell said that on April 11th, our Building Engineers will provide a tour of the building. Residents may sign up for the tour. If more people than feasible sign up, a second tour will be provided.

OLD BUSINESS:

The Energy Committee will present an update on the Energy Audit at the April Board Meeting.

NEW BUSINESS:

Committee Reports:

Energy Committee: Mr. Drazin, acting Chair, reported that a Committee meeting would be held shortly to review the Energy Audit and prepare a report for the April Board Meeting. A notice of the meeting will be posted in the elevators.

Refurbishment Committee: Ms. Gann reported that Jason Fisher, our ECA Counsel, has completed negotiations with Hartman Design Group, Inc. on the design contract. The contract will be voted on this evening.

Social Committee: Ms. Barth reported no activities are planned for April or May, but there will likely be a “summer kick off” party and a “fall end of summer” event. Due to budget constraints, residents may be asked to contribute toward these programs. In addition, Ms. Barth is asking Ms. Farrell to make the remote control to the new television available for residents who would like to watch a program.

Exercise Room Committee: Ms. Kielty reported that the Committee has met twice and has identified several pieces of equipment that would enhance the facility. The Committee has asked for funding in the 2009-2010 budget. In addition, the Committee is asking that refurbishment funds be set-aside in 2011 to work on the Exercise Room. Mr. Trebach (#1007) asked what type of equipment is being considered and was told it would be elliptical equipment. Mr. Jones (#307) noted that many existing machines are not well maintained and/or are antiquated.

Security: Dr. Muller reported that the new computerized system, which Securitas guards use for checking in, while patrolling, has been installed. This will verify how many times and at what times guards check a specific area. He also suggested that during refurbishment, lobby doors might be changed to provide for better security.

Contracts:

Dr. Muller moved that the Board approve Densel Company’s service contract to maintain the chillers. The cost is $15,463 or 3.5% higher than previously. Ms. Barth seconded the motion. Mr. Cunningham, Mr. Axelrad, Ms. Gann, Ms. Fridell, Ms. Kielty, Ms. Barth and Dr. Muller voted in favor of the motion. The motion passed.

Tracey Geiger from DeLeon & Stang arrived at this point, and business was suspended to allow for comments on the Audit Report. Ms. Geiger stated that overall the Elizabeth is financially healthy with no deficit. She noted that Management and the Board executed improvements in internal controls, which have strengthened the safety of the financial statements.

Dr. Salcetti (#319) asked Ms. Geiger for her evaluation of the Reserve Study. She noted that the company, which performed the study, Reserve Advisors, is well known and she commented ECA for commissioning a Reseerve Study. However, she stated that she could not answer questions relating to engineering concerns as that was not in DeLeon & Stang’s audit purview.

Ms. Winthrop (#1114) asked Ms. Geiger if she thought the Elizabeth should be looking at outside management or should remain self-managed. Ms. Geiger stated that among self-managed buildings that DeLeon & Stang audits, ECA ranked at the top. She also noted that Legum & Norman is an excellent company and can tailor their management services to the specific needs of the Elizabeth. She indicated that the majority of condominiums are managed by outside firms. She also indicated that we are currently using accounting software that should be updated, or, alternately, we might consider using an outside financial company for the accounting functions.

Mr. Feldman (#1819) noted that using a professional management company would allow the Elizabeth to obtain only those services it wants and could possible renegotiate down several service contracts based on volume discounts an outside management company may be able to realize.

Ms. Cook (#1620) stated that an outside management company would be too expensive for the services provided.

Mr. Bosma (#1818) inquired why contracts were not discussed at public meetings. He was informed that all contracts are discussed at public meetings.

Ms. Kielty asked Ms, Geiger for her recommendations for next year. In addition to having management review Minutes prior to approval, she indicated that the Treasurer should monitor owner delinquencies; we should upgrade our accounting software, and the Treasurer should also be alert to changes in the amount of FDIC insurance on deposits.

Mr. Stevens (#121) asked how much an upgrade to the accounting software would cost. Ms. Geiger replied that a professional version costs about $10,000 and would come with yearly updates. She also stated that many small businesses use QuickBooks, ECA’s existing software, since it costs only about $300, but that they use a more updated version.

Ms. Bobb (#911) asked whether the individual residents or the Elizabeth would receive the tax credits for window replacements. Ms. Geiger cautioned that tax issues were not her specialty; she indicated that since windows are a common element, any tax credit for such a purchase, if available, would accrue to the Elizabeth.

Mr. Cunningham thanked Ms Geiger for coming to the meeting, and she left. The Board unanimously approved the FY 2008 audited financial statements.

THE MEETING RESUMED WITH CONTRACT APPROVALS.

Mr. Axelrad moved that the Board approve Otis Elevators’ contract for renewal of elevator maintenance with an increase of almost 10% or $2,385.29 for a total contract price of $27,478.26. Ms. Barth seconded the motion. Mr. Cunningham, Mr. Axelrad, Ms. Gann, Ms. Fridell, Ms. Kielty, Ms. Barth and Dr. Muller voted in favor of the motion. The motion passed.

Dr. Muller moved that the Board ratify Structural Preservation‘s contract to repair and overlay membrane on G-3. The cost would be $160,296. Ms. Kielty seconded the motion. Mr. Cunningham, Mr. Axelrad, Ms. Gann, Ms. Fridell, Ms. Kielty, Ms. Barth and Dr. Muller voted in favor of the motion. The motion passed.

Ms. Kielty moved that the Board approve a contract for Densel to provide three variable speed drives on the fan motors of the Cooling Tower for a cost of $13,725. The drives will save energy. Dr. Muller seconded the motion. Mr. Cunningham, Mr. Axelrad, Ms. Gann, Ms. Fridell, Ms. Kielty, Ms. Barth and Dr. Muller voted in favor of the motion. The motion passed.

Ms. Barth moved that the Board approve the contract presented by the Hartman Design Group. Dr. Muller seconded the motion.

Mr. Axelrad presented another motion to include the following text into the Hartman contract. “The parties understand that the entire total cost of all commitments under and pursuant to this agreement is not to exceed $1.2 million unless and until the Elizabeth Condominium Association’s Board of Directors explicitly approves raising this ceiling on costs incurred under this agreement and any approval is communicated to Hartman Design Group, Inc. in writing by an authorized officer of the Board.” Ms. Gann seconded the motion.

Given the fact that Hartman Design Group has rejected the possibility of including a price cap in the design contract, Ms. Fridell asked that the Board pass a resolution specifying a dollar limit on the amount it is willing to spend on design work. She stated that Mr. Fisher has advised the Board that, in his opinion, the Hartman contract is a one sided contract. Ms. Fridell also noted that there is no explicit commitment, in the contract, that Hartman Design Group would assist us with selecting contractors, holding a bidders’ conference, etc., in contrast to what Ms. Hartman has represented to Board members verbally.

Ms. Kielty agreed that there must be a design cap for monitoring purposes.

Dr. Muller agreed that there should be a cap on the design fee.

Mr. Axelrad explained that his motion would provide a cap on the total refurbishing project expenditure.

Ms. Fridell asked the members of the Refurbishing Committee what was the cost estimate provided by Hartman Design Group for design fees. She said that the resolution limiting design fees ought to be based on that figure.

Ms. Barth said that there is no price cap in the contract or the fee. She said Phyllis Hartman says interior design is a process, and we will need to make decisions on spending as we go along.

Ms. Gann said that she agrees with Mr. Axelrad’s addition to the contract but would like to include a resolution limiting the design fee also.

Dr. Muller agreed that the Board should make a decision on a cost limitation for design.

Ms. Kielty again recommended a limitation on the design fee.

Mr. Axelrad indicated that his addition to the contract would add legal protection for ECA.

Mr. Cunningham called the question.

Ms. Kielty moved that the Board approve the contract with Mr. Axelrad’s amendment specifying an overall limit on the refurbishing project that can be increased only by Board decision. There was no second.

Dr. Muller suggested tabling the motion and presenting a new motion with a spending limit for the design phase of the refurbishing project. Ms. Gann seconded the motion. Mr. Cunningham, Mr. Axelrad, Ms. Gann, Ms. Fridell, Ms. Kielty, and Dr. Muller voted in favor of the motion. Ms. Barth voted against the motion. The motion passed.

Dr. Muller made a motion providing a cap of $250,000 for the design fee. Ms. Fridell seconded the motion. Mr. Cunningham, Mr. Axelrad, Ms. Gann, Ms. Fridell, Ms. Kielty, Ms. Barth and Dr. Muller voted in favor of the motion. The motion passed.

The original motion to approve the contract as amended by Mr. Axelrad was untabled. Mr. Cunningham, Mr. Axelrad, Ms. Gann, Ms. Fridell, Ms. Kielty, Ms. Barth and Dr. Muller voted in favor of the motion. The motion passed.

Ms. Gann moved that the Board ratify the purchase of a pool heat exchanger from A.D. Heath Company for $12,995. Ms. Fridell seconded the motion. Mr. Cunningham, Mr. Axelrad, Ms. Gann, Ms. Fridell, Ms. Kielty, Ms. Barth and Dr. Muller voted in favor of the motion. The motion passed.

COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR:

Ms. Bobb, #911, asked if the Board had looked into leasing, rather than purchasing, exercise equipment. Ms. Kielty said the Committee had looked into it, but few companies provide leasing options. Ms. Bobb said she is impressed with Ms. Hartman and questioned if the design fee would exceed $250,000. Ms. Fridell reiterated that there is not a price cap in the present contract nor did Hartman Design Group accept such a cap during negotiations.

Mr. Feldman, #1819, said that the amount spent should be the sum of “people” time not the $250,000 that the Board has determined to be the cap. He indicated that this information should be kept within the purview of the Elizabeth and should not be discussed with Hartman Design Group or anyone else.

Mr. Bason, #110, asked if there would be an informational session for the owners once the design is completed. Ms. Gann assured him there would be.

Ms. Olshan, #1014, asked if the Elizabeth would receive plans for all areas and was told we would.

Ms. Gann presented Ms. Brosnan’s (#1402) letter regarding removal of cars with expired tags, flat tires, etc. from the garage. Mr. Trebach, #1407, concurred that such cars are in the garage and complained about cars left idling in the garage for long periods of time spewing noxious fumes. Ms. Farrell was directed to inspect the garage and to notify owners of those cars that are not in compliance with the House Rules.

Dr. Aaronson, 201, commended former Social Committee Chair, Ruby Brooks, “as a real gem” and thanked her for her contribution to the Social Committee over the years. He said “she treats others, as she would like to be treated.” He asked that this comment be included in the Minutes. Dr. Muller suggested that a letter of appreciation be sent to Ms. Brooks for all her work on behalf of the Elizabeth.

Mr. Bason, #110, asked why Mr. Lawson’s letter regarding residents’ raising ballot issues had not been discussed. Mr. Cunningham replied that the letter had been referred to ECA counsel for review.

Mr. Feldman, #1819, noted that the baggage carts are frequently not available for use. He said there should be check in/check out procedures in place, and everyone should follow them. Mr. Trebach, #1407, said the front desk should call a residents listed on the sign-out sheet if carts have not been returned.

Ms. Alenier, #301, said the front desk person should answer the main phone line rather than calls being directed first to an auto-attendant. Mr. Cunningham assured her that in the future, the front desk person will answer the phone at all times. Management was directed to change the telephone programming immediately.

The meeting was adjourned at 9:40 p.m.


[These minutes were prepared by Judith Gann, Secretary of the ECA, and Karren Alenier posted these minutes to this blog. Alenier has bolded some of the issues for ease of locating specific topics. The ECA Board Meeting Minutes is a public document and available in paper copy at the ECA Management office.]

Saturday, April 4, 2009

Elizabeth Building tour

On March 4 over 20 Elizabethans assembled in the lobby to meet the senior building engineer Jimmy Keating for a tour of the Elizabeth's inner workings.

This tour included such things as seeing the engineer's office where he keeps his checklists and the computer monitors that watch the heating & cooling systems, the elevators, and garage doors as well as the rooms housing the big machinery of the heating & cooling systems, the controls for the pool, and the trash compactors.





Going up on the roof was literally breath-taking. Not only is the scenery awesome (we could see the cherry trees in Somerset of course, and we could also see all the way to Dulles airport) but it was also a rather windy day! However, everyone made the trip safely across the roof to see the big chillers and other elements housed in a room up there without being blown away.

Friday, March 20, 2009

Summary of March 2009 Elizabeth Condo Board Meeting

The March meeting of Elizabeth Condo Board highlighted such items as the annual audit, professional management, and the contract with Phyllis Hartman of the Harman Design Group related to the building refurbishment. Here is a thumbnail list of what took place.

A representative from DeLeon & Stang provided a quick overview of the late annual audit report (held up by the Board in favor of completing the Reserve Study first). Finances appear to be in good shape and under sound auditing principals. A question from the floor regarding whether window replacement would provide a tax break to either the building or owners yielded a positive response.

Among the items reported by treasurer Monique Fridell was that while delinquencies doubled in January and February, they went down 2.09% in this period. One case has gone to litigation but other cases have been resolved.

A considerable amount of time was spent discussing and voting on the contract with Phyllis Hartman relative to the building refurbishment. Jeffrey Alexrad wanted the contract to state that the ECA total budget limitation is $1.2 million. This limitation includes Hartman’s design work, materials and other contracted work. Monique Fridell wanted the Board to agree on a spending cap for Hartman’s design work.

The Board is closing in on details regarding how professional management will be handled. Once a contract is signed, there will be an information meeting (as early as April) including a presentation by Legum & Norman to discuss the details.

The nominating committee for election of three new Board members will be Peg Downey, Jerry Feldman, and Pat Peyser. They will accept candidate resumes until April 15. There will be a Meet the Candidates evening on April 23. [Current Board members whose tenure is up include Monique Fridell, Judy Gann, and Alexandra Kielty.]

A contract was agreed upon by the Board to begin maintenance work on the G-3 level of the parking garage. The work, which includes quick setting concrete, periodic jack hammering and concrete dust, will go on for two months. Plastic is available at the front desk to cover cars in the construction area.

Arcade owners asked for placement of planters and benches to spruce up the arcade. The Board authorized use of existing planters. Also it was mentioned that the new arcade sign was paid for by the arcade owners.

The Social Committee will organize use of the new West Lobby television. Residents wishing to use the TV will be able to sign up on a list available at the desk.

Comments from the floor included concerns about replacement of exercise equipment, having front desk staff answer the phone (and not make the caller go through the automated attendant), cars that leak oil destroying the membrane, residents running car engines for extended periods of time that cause toxic fumes throughout the garage, and cars that have no current tags on them.